Screening is where you decide which citations belong in your review. VADRR runs screening in two
stages — abstract (title/abstract) first, then
full-text — and uses
machine learning to show you the most likely-relevant citations
first.
For every citation a reviewer records one of three decisions:
A citation that hasn't been decided yet is Unlabeled.
When you create a screening you choose how many reviewers must look at each citation:
Non-perpetual screenings (Pilot and the Fixed N Size variants) instead hand each reviewer a
fixed number of citations.
A citation's overall standing at each stage (accepted/rejected) is its qualification. Privileged
decisions — for example an expert's call, or a conflict resolution — can override individual labels.
Open your project ▸ Abstract Screenings. From here you can:

The Abstract Screenings page lists each screening with its type and rules.
The table shows each screening's Type, its Options (exclusive users, hide author/journal, and
which decisions require a reason/tag/note/form), and Participant (No. of Labels).
Click Create New Screening and configure:
How you start depends on your role. Contributors land on a work-selection page and click
Screen Next Task (or Screen Pilot Round for a pilot) to be served the next citation. Leaders
and consolidators see the screening's results page with a Continue Screening button instead.
Either way the ML model decides the order. When you have no citations left to screen the button reads
Nothing Left to Screen, and the single-citation view shows "All citations screened." Past
decisions can be revisited via Your Labels (in the citation view) or My Labels (the per-screening
links on the work-selection page).