After abstract screening, the citations you accepted move to full-text screening — a second, stricter pass where you assess the complete article against your eligibility criteria.
Who can do this: any reviewer assigned to the full-text screening.
The Full-text screening tool differs a bit from the Title/Abstract tool. For the Full-text tool, there are two modes:
Why the difference? Teams may not have access to the full-text articles all at once and may prefer to screen in full-text citations as PDFs are received. The Self-managed mode allows for this flexibility.
This mode is very similar to the Title/Abstract screening.
You begin by configuring Reasons (for exlusion) and Tags, just as you did with Title/Abstract screening. The remaining tools are the same as the Title/Abstract tool (except there is no machine learning engine behind the scenes...full-text screening is completely a human decision.

When you switch to Self-managed mode, you will be taken to a page with three tabs at the top. The first tab will be the Settings tab. You must first (1) determine how many screeners are needed to make a full-text inclusion/exclusion decision, and (2) determine all settings for Reasons, Tags, etc.

Set up the screening type, blinding, and required reasons/tags/notes/forms the same way as for
abstract screening — see Screening overview and
Configuring reasons & tags (switch the Configure Reasons and Tags
modal to the full-text stage).
Once you have determined all the settings on the Settings tab, you will notice that the Citations tab is no longer grayed out. Click on the citations tab to see the list of citations that have passed Title/Abstract screening.

This is the primary page you will use to complete full-text screenings.
As with Title/Abstract title screenings:
Manual decisions occur outside the full-text screening tool (in the Citation Lifecycle Management page). But, you might wonder what "manual" decisions are and when they might be relevant.
When "Manual" Decisions are Relevant: There are a few circumstances where acceptance or rejection of a citation will bypass the typical two-step screening process:
- When there is a duplicate that made it past the deduplication tool (manually reject)
- When a new article is recently published an identified as relevant by a member of the team (and you do not want to wait for it to cycle through the two step screening process (manually accept)
Example
Let's say that a new article was just published from a research group that we have been following who has been doing work relevant to our project. We import in the citation and then want to immediately "promote" the citation to "Needs Extraction" status.
From the Citations Lifecycle Management page, we search up and select the article. When we do this, we have the options to manually promote it within the system. When we click on Full-text Acceptance, a warning will pop up.

However, when we click on full-text Rejection, we see the following:

Because reasons for full-text rejection are reqired by PRISMA, you must pick a reason for rejection before you can proceed. Any full-text accept or reject decitions made in this way will appear as "Manual Decision" in the full-text screening Citations tab.
Note that once full-text screened, a citation can be screened again. You just need to click the Screen again button.

The labels tab will also present a list of citations that have already been full-text screened (the Citations tab presents a list of all citations whether they have been screened or not). You can use this tab to quickly sort on the final decisions (1 = accept, -1 = reject). You can also Screen again on this page.