With the form built, reviewers fill it in for each included study. Each
extraction is one reviewer's data for one citation, and it moves through a simple review workflow.
Who can do this: Leaders, Consolidators, and Contributors can create and edit extractions.
From the project's Extractions ▸ dropdown, choose Data Extractions
(/projects/<id>/extractions) to see the list, then open one to Work on it. (Citations become available for extraction once they've cleared screening — see
Citation lifecycle.)

The work screen: assignment and status at the top, the form's section tabs below.
The header shows Assigned to (the extractor), the citation and its Refman ID, and the
extraction status controls.
The Extraction Status buttons track progress:
| Status | Color | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| awaiting_work | orange | being worked on / not yet submitted |
| awaiting_review | blue | submitted, waiting for a reviewer |
| work_returned | red | a reviewer sent it back for changes |
| work_accepted | green | a reviewer approved it |
Removing a Type 1 item that already has data (or is used in comparisons) requires typing CONFIRM,
since it causes data loss.